🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial policy to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are observing intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Movement

In Europe, a rising number of states are exploring similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our kids' innocence". The policy may be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on the legislature to approve a bill increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended parents to restrict their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a advisory statement demanding a ban for minors without guardian approval is provided. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these services, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a useful first step," said a leading MEP behind the initiative.

The UK: A Watchful Eye

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but insisting any action must be "supported by conclusive research".

Last year, momentum grew behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised concerns. An organization established by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after viewing dangerous online content argues that a simple age ban might not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to build tools that are appropriate and fit for minors," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, legislation is primarily occurring at the regional level amid country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further access needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced measures demanding adult authorization for minors to set up social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from various individuals to mimic this path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Apart from the West, other states are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, global bodies adopt a more cautious position. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might backfire". The body highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

While this global debate evolves, the steps of Australia and its followers demonstrate that states around the world are increasingly content to delay for the industry to self-regulate.